Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) Audi ₱4,080,000 | Mini Aceman SE (2025) Mini ₱3,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 225 PS @ 4500-6250 rpm | 215 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 330 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.4 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 222 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 29.4 (9.6) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 40.9 (6.9) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 35.8 (7.9) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Hatchback |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4629 | 4079 |
| Width (mm) | 1898 | 1754 |
| Height (mm) | 1655 | 1514 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2807 | 2606 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1755 | 1710 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | 5-Link | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Trapezoidal Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x8.0" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/45 R20 | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/45 R20 | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI AT (2015) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and practicality, the Mini Aceman SE edges out the 2015 Audi Q5 in overall value, while the Audi remains the stronger choice for those who prioritize traditional SUV power and all‑wheel‑drive capability. The Aceman is ₱530,000 cheaper (₱3.55 million vs ₱4.08 million) and offers a modern electric powertrain with 215 PS and 330 Nm, sufficient for city and suburban driving. Its compact dimensions (4.08 m L × 1.75 m W × 1.51 m H) and 2+2 seating make it easier to park in Manila’s tight streets, and the 3‑year/100,000 km warranty adds peace of mind for a new model. However, it is front‑wheel‑drive only and lacks the larger cargo space typical of a full‑size SUV. The Audi Q5 delivers higher output (225 PS, 380 Nm), an 8‑speed automatic, AWD, and a longer‑standing reputation, but at a higher price, discontinued status and a 2‑year unlimited warranty that may raise concerns about parts availability. If you need genuine off‑road capability, higher torque and prefer a conventional gasoline SUV, the Q5 is suitable; if you want lower purchase cost, electric efficiency and easier urban maneuverability, the Mini Aceman SE is the better fit.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mini Aceman SE costs ₱3,550,000, which is ₱530,000 less than the Audi Q5’s price of ₱4,080,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Audi Q5 produces 225 PS, slightly more than the Mini Aceman SE’s 215 PS, while the Q5 also delivers higher torque at 380 Nm versus 330 Nm.
Is the Audi Q5 still available?
The Audi Q5 is listed as discontinued, meaning new units are no longer sold, whereas the Mini Aceman SE is a current 2025 model.
Which SUV is more practical for city driving in the Philippines?
The Mini Aceman SE’s smaller size, front‑wheel‑drive layout and electric powertrain make it easier to navigate Manila’s congested streets and parking, while the Audi’s larger AWD SUV may be less convenient in tight urban conditions.