Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,733,888 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 3198 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | VG Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3800 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T, LSD | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4878 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1902 | 2198 |
| Height (mm) | 1847 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2750 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8L 4×4 LTZ AT Dsl (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing an SUV against a pickup, the choice hinges on intended use, budget, and practicality. The 2015 Chevrolet Trailblazer LTZ costs ₱1,733,888, about ₱105,888 more than the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak at ₱1,628,000. Both share a 200 PS output, but the Trailblazer delivers a higher torque peak of 500 Nm at 2000 rpm versus the Ranger’s 470 Nm spread over 1750‑2500 rpm, giving the SUV a slight edge in low‑end pull, useful for off‑road or heavy loads. The Trailblazer’s body‑on‑frame construction and 4WD system with LSD suit rugged terrain, while the Ranger’s longer wheelbase (5277 mm vs 4878 mm) and wider track (2198 mm) provide more interior space and stability, especially for cargo. Seating capacity favors the Trailblazer with a 2+3+2 layout (seven seats) compared to the Ranger’s 2+3 (five seats), making the SUV more family‑oriented. However, the Ranger is currently available, whereas the Trailblazer is not, potentially affecting service and parts. Both carry the same 100,000 km/3‑year warranty. If you need a family‑friendly, seven‑seat SUV for occasional off‑road trips and can manage availability issues, the Trailblazer is suitable. If you prioritize a lower price, current availability, and a work‑oriented pickup with ample cargo length, the Ranger Wildtrak is the better pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,628,000 compared to the Chevrolet Trailblazer’s ₱1,733,888.
Which model offers more torque?
The Chevrolet Trailblazer provides higher torque at 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm, while the Ford Ranger delivers 470 Nm @ 1750‑2500 rpm.
Is the Trailblazer or Ranger better for family use?
The Trailblazer seats up to seven (2+3+2) versus the Ranger’s five (2+3), making the SUV more suitable for larger families.
What about availability and warranty?
The Ranger is currently available, whereas the Trailblazer is not; both come with a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty.