Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT (2017) Mazda ₱918,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1496cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, S-VT |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 108 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 139 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4060 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1495 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1025 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 15x5.5-inch alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 15x5.5-inch alloys |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 185/65/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking to purchase a new hatchback, the Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT emerges as a more suitable choice for several reasons. Firstly, it offers better fuel efficiency and performance with its higher power output of 108 PS compared to Ford Ecosport's 110 PS. Additionally, the Mazda is equipped with an unibody construction which provides superior safety features and overall durability. For daily commuting or urban driving, the Mazda’s FWD setup makes it more agile and responsive than the RWD of the Ford Ecosport. The price difference between the two models also favors the Mazda, making it a better value for money.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper?
The Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT (₱918,000) is cheaper than the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (₱958,000).
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
While both cars use gas, the Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT with 108 PS and 139 Nm of torque offers slightly better performance which can translate to improved fuel efficiency in daily driving conditions.
Which car is more powerful?
The Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT has a higher power output at 110 PS compared to the Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT's 108 PS, making it slightly more powerful for those seeking strong performance.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Mazda 2 Hatchback SkyActiv-V+ AT with its FWD setup and higher power output makes it a better choice for daily commuting or urban driving. It's also equipped with an unibody construction which enhances safety features and overall reliability.