Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱720,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pick-up |
| Segment | A | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 5113 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1703 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 935 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing daily city commuting with lower upfront costs, the Honda Brio 1.3 S is the clear choice at ₱631,000, offering a 1.3L naturally aspirated engine with 100 PS and 5-speed manual transmission. However, if the buyer requires work capability, cargo hauling, or off-road utility, the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis is the superior option despite its higher price of ₱720,000. The Ranger features a larger 2.2L turbocharged diesel engine producing 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed manual and 4x2 drivetrain, while the Brio is strictly a 2-door hatchback with 1339cc displacement. The Ranger also offers significantly more physical space with a length of 5113mm and width of 2163mm, though it has only 2 doors and limited seating compared to the Brio. Ultimately, choose the Brio for economical, low-maintenance city driving, or the Ford Ranger for heavy-duty tasks where the turbo diesel torque provides necessary pulling power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S is cheaper at ₱631,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis which costs ₱720,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis is more powerful with a turbocharged 2.2L engine producing 120 PS, whereas the Honda Brio has a naturally aspirated 1.3L engine with 100 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting in Manila traffic?
The Honda Brio is better suited for daily commuting due to its lower price, compact hatchback design, and naturally aspirated engine designed for city driving.
Which vehicle offers more utility and towing capability?
The Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis offers superior utility as a pick-up truck with a 2.2L turbo diesel engine and 285 Nm of torque, while the Honda Brio is a 5-door hatchback with no specified towing capability.