Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Honda Jazz 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Honda Jazz 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 | Honda Jazz 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2018) Honda ₱1,058,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2477cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 8valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 21.1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Natural Aspirated i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 145 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-2 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4420 | 4035 |
| Width (mm) | 1650 | 1694 |
| Height (mm) | 1830 | 1524 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2530 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1535 | 1085 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 40 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring | Independent MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring | H-Shaped Torsion Beam w/ Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy | 16" Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy | 15'' Alloy |
| Front Tires | 185/80 R14 | 185/55 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 185/80 R14 | 185/55 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | no | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic with Touch Panel Controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Smart Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Honda Jazz 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and spacious vehicle with good fuel efficiency, the Honda Jazz might be more suitable due to its CVT transmission which offers smoother driving experience and lower maintenance costs compared to the MT of the Mitsubishi. The Jazz is also available in current stock while the Adventure has been discontinued.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between the Honda Jazz and Mitsubishi Adventure?
The Honda Jazz starts at ₱1,058,000, which is slightly more expensive than the Mitsubishi Adventure's price of ₱1,010,000.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
While not explicitly stated, a CVT transmission in the Honda Jazz and naturally aspirated engine in the Mitsubishi Adventure suggest that the Jazz might have better fuel efficiency due to smoother driving and lower aspiration requirements.
Which car is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Honda Jazz with its FWD drivetrain and current stock availability makes it a good choice for daily commuting, whereas the RWD of the Mitsubishi Adventure could be less practical in urban settings.
Which car offers better power and torque?
The Honda Jazz outperforms the Mitsubishi Adventure with 120 PS vs. 75 PS and 145 Nm vs. 149 Nm respectively, making it more powerful and potentially suitable for those who need a bit more oomph.