Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025) Suzuki ₱1,059,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2025
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 3-years/100,000 km
Availability Discontinued Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2477cc 1462cc
Valvetrain SOHC 8valve 16-valve
Compression Ratio 21.1
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Max Power 75 PS @ 4200 rpm 104 PS
Max Torque 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm 138 Nm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T Automatic 4-Speed
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Performance & Economy
Emission Standard Euro-2
Body & Dimensions
Body Type AUV Small Crossover SUV
Segment M Crossover
Construction Body-on-frame Unibody
Doors 5 5
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+3
Length (mm) 4420 3995
Width (mm) 1650 1765
Height (mm) 1830 1550
Wheelbase (mm) 2620 2520
Curb Weight (kg) 1535 1010
Fuel Tank (L) 55 37
Exterior Colors Silky Silver Metallic, Celestial Blue Pearl Metallic, Arctic White, Bluish Black, Granite Gray Metallic
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring
Rear Suspension Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring Torsion beam w/Coil Spring
Front Wheels 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy 16
Rear Wheels 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy 16
Front Tires 185/80 R14 195/60R16
Rear Tires 185/80 R14 195/60R16
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Drum
Steering Type Hydraulic Hydraulic
Steering Column no Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) No Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution No Yes
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Aircon Automatic Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Fabric Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Mechanical
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes no
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 4
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay Yes Yes
Android Auto Yes No
USB Yes No
AUX Input No No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights Halogen LED
Fog Lights Yes No
Daytime Running Lights No Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (2025): which should you buy?

The Suzuki Fronx GL 4AT (₱1,059,000) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers due to its superior power and modern features. It delivers 104 PS of power versus 75 PS from the 2015 Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (₱1,010,000), which is also discontinued. The Fronx offers a gasoline engine with a 16-valve valvetrain, while the Adventure uses a diesel engine with a 8-valve setup. With a 4-speed automatic transmission and a unibody construction, the Fronx provides smoother handling and better durability for daily use, whereas the Adventure’s 5-speed manual transmission and body-on-frame design prioritize ruggedness but sacrifice driver convenience. The Fronx’s 2+3 seating capacity is adequate for a small family, while the Adventure’s 5-door layout is less flexible. Given its current availability and competitive features, the Fronx aligns better with current market needs.