Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) Mitsubishi ₱1,010,000 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025) Toyota ₱1,025,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2477cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 8valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 21.1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 75 PS @ 4200 rpm | 139 PS |
| Max Torque | 149 Nm @ 2500 rpm | 183 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-2 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Van |
| Segment | M | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+10 |
| Length (mm) | 4420 | 4968 |
| Width (mm) | 1650 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1830 | 2097 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2750 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1535 | 1905 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 55 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone Suspension with Coil Spring | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Semi-Elliptic Leaf Spring | Rigid Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14 x 5.0JJ Alloy | 14 |
| Front Tires | 185/80 R14 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 185/80 R14 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | no | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport (7-seater) MT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Utility Van Gas M/T SWB (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and spacious vehicle with good fuel efficiency, the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport is the better choice. It offers more power, better torque, and has been discontinued but still retains its value due to its reliability and space. The Toyota Tamaraw, while current and having more seats, lacks in terms of power and features compared to the Mitsubishi.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport and the Toyota Tamaraw?
The Mitsubishi Adventure 2.0 GLS Sport is ₱1010000 while the Toyota Tamaraw costs ₱1025000, making the Mitsubishi slightly cheaper.
Which vehicle offers more power between the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport and the Toyota Tamaraw?
The Toyota Tamaraw has a higher maximum power of 139 PS compared to the Mitsubishi's 75 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting considering fuel efficiency and space?
The Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport offers more passenger capacity with its 7-seater configuration, which can be beneficial for daily commuting needs.
Which vehicle has a better warranty period between the Mitsubishi Adventure 2.5 GLS Sport and the Toyota Tamaraw?
Both vehicles offer warranties of up to 3 years or 100,000 kilometers, but the Mitsubishi's model year is discontinued while the Toyota's availability is current.