Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Tata ₱830,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2179cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, CRDi | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 140 PS @ 4000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1700-2700 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Segment | Pickup | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5125 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1833 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3150 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1980 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x5.5-inch Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 215/75/R16 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/75/R16 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Tata Xenon 2.2 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
The Tata Xenon 2.2 (₱830,000) is the better choice for Filipino buyers prioritizing power and utility. Its 140 PS diesel engine delivers significantly more torque (320 Nm vs. 123 Nm) and is paired with a 5-speed manual transmission, making it suitable for demanding off-road or heavy-duty tasks. The Toyota Vios (₱841,000) offers 99 PS from a naturally aspirated gas engine with a CVT, making it more economical for daily commuting but less powerful. While both have identical seating (2+3) and warranty terms (100,000km/3-years), the Xenon’s higher power and drivetrain (RWD vs. FWD) align better with users needing strength and versatility. Given the discontinued status of the Xenon and its superior performance, it is recommended for practical, task-oriented owners. The Vios remains a solid daily driver for those valuing fuel efficiency and comfort.