Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT (2015) Toyota ₱1,705,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 3198 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 178 PS @ 6000 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 231 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | D | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1825 | 2198 |
| Height (mm) | 1470 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1475 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Dual-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 215/55 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | — |
| Steering Ratio | 5.5 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry & Alarm | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
The 2015 Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT and the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT serve very different needs, so the choice hinges on lifestyle rather than pure price. The Camry is priced at ₱1,705,000, about ₱77,000 more than the Ranger’s ₱1,628,000, but it offers a sedan’s comfort, a refined 2.5‑L inline‑4 engine with 178 PS and 231 Nm, and a front‑wheel‑drive layout ideal for city commuting and family trips. Its 4‑door sedan body, 4,825 mm length and 2+3 seating make it practical for daily use and parking in urban areas. Conversely, the Ranger’s 3.2‑L turbo‑charged inline‑5 delivers 200 PS and a robust 470 Nm, paired with a 4WD system and a larger 5,277 mm wheelbase, giving it superior off‑road capability and cargo capacity for a pick‑up. If you need a workhorse for hauling, weekend adventures, or rural driving, the Ranger’s higher torque and 4WD outweigh its slightly lower power and larger footprint. For a buyer prioritising ride comfort, fuel‑efficient gasoline operation, and a compact sedan for city life, the Camry is the better fit. In short, choose the Camry for everyday comfort and the Ranger for utility and off‑road performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is cheaper at ₱1,628,000 compared to the Toyota Camry 2.5 G AT priced at ₱1,705,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ranger produces 200 PS, while the Camry delivers 178 PS, making the Ranger more powerful.
Which vehicle offers more torque?
The Ranger provides 470 Nm of torque, significantly higher than the Camry’s 231 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Camry, with its sedan body, front‑wheel drive, smaller dimensions and gasoline engine, is better suited for urban daily commuting than the larger, 4WD pick‑up Ranger.