Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) Mini ₱3,250,000 | Mini Aceman SE (2025) Mini ₱3,550,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2025 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1998cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 11 | — |
| Aspiration | TwinPower Turbo | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 192 PS @ 5000 - 6000 | 215 PS |
| Max Torque | 280 Nm @ 1250-4600 rpm | 330 Nm |
| Transmission | 6- speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.2 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 230km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Convertible | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Hatchback |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 3850 | 4079 |
| Width (mm) | 1727 | 1754 |
| Height (mm) | 1415 | 1514 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2495 | 2606 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1350 | 1710 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 44 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Orange |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 19 |
| Steering Type | Electronic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt and telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Tires | — | 255/45R19 |
| Rear Tires | — | 255/45R19 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | Yes | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | led | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Mini Convertible S 2.0 AT (2016) vs Mini Aceman SE (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact car with practicality and affordability, the Mini Convertible S 2016 is the better choice. It offers more power, quicker acceleration, and a higher top speed at a lower price point. The Mini Aceman SE, while electric and offering impressive performance, is priced significantly higher and comes in a smaller package.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data provided does not specify fuel efficiency for either vehicle. However, the Mini Convertible S 2016 uses gas, which can be more economical than electric vehicles like the Mini Aceman SE.
What is the difference in power between the two models?
The Mini Convertible S 2016 has a maximum power of 192 PS, while the Mini Aceman SE has a maximum power of 215 PS. The Aceman SE offers more power but at a higher price point.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mini Convertible S 2016 is generally considered better for daily commuting due to its lower cost, more powerful engine, and faster acceleration compared to the electric Mini Aceman SE.
What are the exterior colors available on each model?
The Mini Convertible S 2016 comes in one color: not specified. The Mini Aceman SE is available only in orange.