Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱720,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1193cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5 : 1 | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | INVECS-III CVT | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pick-up |
| Segment | B | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3795 | 5113 |
| Width (mm) | 1665 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1703 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2450 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 845 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x4.5 | 16'' Steel |
| Rear Wheels | 14x4.5 | 16'' Steel |
| Front Tires | 165/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 165/65 R14 | 215/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Electronic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Standard |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | No |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a practical and fuel-efficient vehicle with good power output at an affordable price point, the Mitsubishi Mirage is the better choice. The Ford Ranger, while powerful and suitable for off-road conditions, comes at a significantly higher cost.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between the Mitsubishi Mirage and the Ford Ranger?
The Mitsubishi Mirage costs ₱688,000 compared to the Ford Ranger's ₱720,000 price tag.
Which car offers better power?
The Ford Ranger with its 120 PS @ 3700 rpm outperforms the Mitsubishi Mirage which has a max power of 78 PS @ 6000 rpm.
Is one car more suitable for daily commuting than the other?
Given their engine types, the Mitsubishi Mirage's naturally aspirated inline-3 engine with its better fuel efficiency makes it a preferable choice for daily commuting compared to the Ford Ranger's turbocharged inline-4 engine.
Which car is better equipped considering they both have 5 doors and similar length?
Both cars share similar dimensions but the Mitsubishi Mirage offers more practicality as it comes in hatchback form while the Ford Ranger is a pick-up, which might not be ideal for all daily needs.