Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) Toyota ₱4,284,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 4461cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Twin Turbo Intercooler CRDI | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 232 PS @ 3200 rpm | 229 PS |
| Max Torque | 615 Nm @ 1800-2200 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5095 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1980 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1945 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2640 | 2005 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 93 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, KDSS | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, KDSS | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 20 |
| Front Tires | 285/60 R18 | 255/45R20 |
| Rear Tires | 285/60 R18 | 255/45R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, performance and daily practicality, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS Long Range emerges as the more balanced choice. Priced at ₱3,698,000 versus the Land Cruiser’s ₱4,284,000, it offers a lower entry cost and a generous five‑year/200,000 km warranty that covers more mileage. The IONIQ 5’s electric powertrain delivers 229 PS and 350 Nm, which is comparable to the Land Cruiser’s 232 PS but with a torque peak at 350 Nm versus 615 Nm, meaning the Land Cruiser still has a higher torque advantage for heavy‑duty or off‑road use. However, the Land Cruiser’s 4WD body‑on‑frame construction and 615 Nm torque make it the superior vehicle for rugged terrain, towing or off‑road adventures. In contrast, the IONIQ 5’s unibody midsize crossover design, RWD drivetrain and modern electric efficiency make it ideal for city commuting, lower fuel costs, and a more comfortable cabin with 2+3 seating. The IONIQ 5 also offers a broader color palette and a more contemporary interior, while the Land Cruiser’s larger length (5095 mm vs. 4655 mm) and 2+3+3 seating capacity cater to larger families or groups. Ultimately, choose the Land Cruiser if you need maximum off‑road capability and a larger crew capacity; opt for the IONIQ 5 if you prioritize lower cost, electric efficiency and urban practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS Long Range costs ₱3,698,000, while the Toyota Land Cruiser LC200 4.5 V8 AT (2016) is priced at ₱4,284,000.
Which has more power?
The Land Cruiser’s V8 engine produces 232 PS and 615 Nm torque, slightly higher than the IONIQ 5’s 229 PS and 350 Nm torque.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5’s electric motor, lower price, and unibody midsize crossover design make it more suitable for city driving and daily commuting.
Which offers better off‑road capability?
The Land Cruiser’s 4WD drivetrain, body‑on‑frame construction and higher torque of 615 Nm give it superior off‑road performance compared to the IONIQ 5’s RWD setup.