Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (2016) Toyota ₱1,599,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 2494cc | 3198 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-i | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 180 PS @ 6000 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 233 Nm @ 4100 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Crossover | Pick Up |
| Segment | J | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4605 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1845 | 2198 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 60 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | — |
| Steering Ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Sport Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Rav-4 2.5 Active+ 4×2 AT (2016) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For those looking for a reliable crossover with good fuel efficiency and ample space, the Toyota Rav-4 is recommended. It offers better power output and towing capacity, making it suitable for families or individuals who need extra space and power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The Rav-4 has a naturally aspirated engine which typically offers better fuel efficiency compared to the turbocharged diesel engine of the Ranger.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak with its 3.2L inline-5 engine delivers more power at 200 PS, making it slightly more powerful than the Toyota Rav-4's 180 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
Both vehicles are capable of daily commuting, but the Rav-4 with its FWD setup and lower overall length might be easier to maneuver in city traffic compared to the Ranger's bulky size.
Which vehicle offers more towing capacity?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak with a 3.2L engine and 4×4 drive system has a higher towing capacity of up to 1800 kg, making it better suited for towing heavy loads or trailers compared to the Rav-4's FWD setup.