Chevrolet Colorado 4×4 2.8D AT LTZ (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 4×4 2.8D AT LTZ (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 4×4 2.8D AT LTZ (2017) Chevrolet ₱1,571,888 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 2779cc | 3198 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3800 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5361 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2123 | 2198 |
| Height (mm) | 1798 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 0 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R 18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R 18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 4×4 2.8D AT LTZ (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
Both vehicles offer good power and towing capabilities but differ significantly in price, size, and features. The Chevrolet Colorado offers a more affordable option with slightly less engine displacement and torque compared to the Ford Ranger. For those looking for a more practical vehicle with better dimensions and additional features, the Ford Ranger is recommended. Cheaper overall cost of ownership might favor the Chevrolet Colorado.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has the best towing capacity?
Both vehicles have 4×4 drivetrain, indicating they can tow up to their respective maximum capacities as per manufacturer specs which are not provided here but typically for these models it would be around 3500 kg and 3700 kg respectively.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
Both vehicles have the same power output of 200 PS @ 3800 rpm, making them equally strong in terms of raw power but the Ford Ranger offers slightly higher torque (470 Nm vs 500 Nm) which can be beneficial for performance and towing.
Which vehicle is better suited for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Colorado might be a better choice for daily commuting due to its smaller size, lower price point, and potentially more affordable maintenance costs. However, the Ford Ranger offers better dimensions and additional features that could make it more comfortable for longer trips or off-road use.
Which vehicle is more spacious inside?
The Ford Ranger has a slightly larger overall length (5277 mm) compared to the Chevrolet Colorado (5361 mm), suggesting it might offer more interior space and possibly better legroom. However, both vehicles have similar seating capacity of 2+3.