Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,568,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 3198 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pick-Up |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 2198 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable pickup truck with good power-to-weight ratio and reasonable fuel efficiency, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is highly recommended over the MT variant. The AT version offers better towing capacity and easier driving experience due to its automatic transmission, making it ideal for those who frequently tow or need a smoother ride. Despite being slightly more expensive at ₱1,628,000 compared to the manual version (₱1,568,000), the AT variant's superior performance and features justify the price difference.
Frequently asked questions
Which Ford Ranger Wildtrak is better for towing?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is recommended for towing due to its automatic transmission which offers better control during heavy loads compared to the manual MT version.
What's the difference in fuel efficiency between the two variants?
There are no direct comparisons of fuel efficiency provided, but the AT variant might offer a slight advantage with smoother driving and potentially lower emissions, though this is not explicitly stated in the data.
Which Ford Ranger Wildtrak has better power output for daily use?
Both the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT and MT models have identical specifications regarding engine type, displacement, valvetrain, aspiration, fuel type, max power, and torque. Therefore, both offer comparable performance suitable for daily use.
Which model is more affordable?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 MT is the cheaper option at ₱1,568,000 compared to the AT variant priced at ₱1,628,000.