Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017) Mazda ₱1,650,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Natural aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 155 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 200 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed AT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Crossover |
| Segment | Pick-Up | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4550 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1675 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2700 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 56 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1514 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 Alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Auto Climate Control System |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD PRO (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a robust and capable vehicle suitable for rough terrain and off-road conditions, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak is the better choice. It offers more power and torque compared to the Mazda CX-5, making it ideal for towing and handling heavy loads. The Ford's 4WD system also provides superior traction in adverse weather conditions. Despite its higher price point, the warranty and reliability of the Ford Ranger make it a safer investment.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has more power with 200 PS compared to the Mazda CX-5's 155 PS.
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
Both vehicles use diesel and gasoline respectively, so they do not provide direct comparisons for fuel efficiency. However, the higher torque of the Ford Ranger can aid in towing heavy loads without needing high fuel consumption.
Which is more reliable based on warranty information?
Both vehicles offer a 100,000 km/3-year warranty, so reliability cannot be determined solely by this information. However, the longer warranty period of the Ford Ranger could indicate better overall reliability.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Mazda CX-5's front-wheel drive and smaller size make it a better choice for city driving and short commutes compared to the off-road capabilities of the Ford Ranger.