Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,595,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1898cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 150 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 350 Nm @ 1800 - 2600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | J |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4825 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1860 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1840 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 255/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 255/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) and the Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 RZ4E AT (2018) hinges on your primary need: off-road capability and power versus family-oriented practicality and lower cost. The Ranger Wildtrak is significantly more powerful with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, has a 4WD drivetrain, and a larger 3.2L engine, making it ideal for heavy-duty work, towing, or off-road adventures. However, it is slightly more expensive at ₱1,628,000 and is a pick-up with a 2+3 seating capacity. The Isuzu mu-X, priced lower at ₱1,595,000, offers a 7-seat SUV body-on-frame construction, better suited for families needing more passenger space. Its 1.9L engine produces 150 PS and 350 Nm, which is adequate for daily commuting and highway driving, but lacks the Ranger's raw power and 4WD. The mu-X also has a newer model year (2018 vs 2017) and similar warranty. If you need a workhorse with off-road prowess, choose the Ranger. If you prioritize passenger capacity, fuel efficiency (smaller engine), and lower price for family use, the mu-X is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 is cheaper at ₱1,595,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 4×4 at ₱1,628,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is more powerful with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, versus the Isuzu mu-X's 150 PS and 350 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Isuzu mu-X is better for daily commuting due to its smaller 1.9L engine, likely better fuel economy, and SUV comfort for up to 7 passengers.
Which has more seating capacity?
The Isuzu mu-X seats 7 (2+3+2), while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak seats only 5 (2+3).