Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018) Nissan ₱1,776,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | M |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5230 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1880 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 2285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2940 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle w/ Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | — |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT and the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium 2.5 MT, the choice hinges on intended use. The Ranger, priced at ₱1,628,000, delivers 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, far out‑stripping the Urvan’s 129 PS and 356 Nm. Its 4‑wheel‑drive system, turbo‑charged inline‑5, and higher ground‑clearance make it ideal for off‑road work, hauling loads, or rural travel, while still offering seating for up to five (2+3). The Urvan, at ₱1,776,000, costs slightly more but provides a 15‑seat capacity (3 doors, 15 passengers) and a body‑on‑frame van layout suited for family or commercial passenger transport in city traffic. Its 5‑speed manual and rear‑wheel‑drive focus on fuel‑efficient cruising rather than rugged performance. Both carry a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. If you need a versatile workhorse that can tackle tough terrain and carry modest crew, the Ranger is the better pick. If you prioritize moving many passengers comfortably on paved roads and can absorb the higher price, the Urvan is the logical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,628,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium at ₱1,776,000.
Which model has more power?
The Ranger has more power, producing 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, whereas the Urvan delivers 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for carrying many passengers?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Premium seats up to 15 passengers, making it far more suitable for large‑group transport than the Ranger, which seats 2+3.
Is the Ranger suitable for city commuting?
While the Ranger can be used in the city, its 4×4 system and higher power are geared toward off‑road and load‑carrying tasks; the Urvan’s RWD and larger passenger capacity are more city‑commuting friendly.