Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Atto 3 Dynamic (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Atto 3 Dynamic (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | BYD Atto 3 Dynamic (2024) BYD ₱1,638,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3198 | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 204 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 310 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Single Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Small Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Crossover |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4455 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1875 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1615 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2720 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Ski White, Boulder Grey |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1680 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17" alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/60/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/60/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 5 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs BYD Atto 3 Dynamic (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with robust power and towing capacity, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L is the better choice. Its diesel engine delivers ample torque suitable for off-road conditions and heavy loads, while its 4×4 setup ensures stability in challenging terrain. The BYD Atto 3, on the other hand, excels in electric range and urban commuting due to its efficient powertrain and all-wheel drive system, making it ideal for city drivers or those who need a versatile vehicle without the diesel smell. Here are some real questions buyers might ask:
"Which is cheaper?" The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L costs ₱1,628,000 compared to the BYD Atto 3 Dynamic at ₱1,638,000.
"Which is more powerful?" The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L has a max power of 200 PS while the BYD Atto 3 Dynamic has 204 PS.
"Which is better for daily commuting?" The BYD Atto 3 Dynamic offers an electric motor, making it more efficient and quieter in city driving conditions compared to the diesel engine of the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L.
"Which is more practical for towing?" The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L's 4×4 setup and robust power output make it better suited for towing heavy loads or rough terrain, while the BYD Atto 3 Dynamic's FWD drivetrain limits its towing capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L and BYD Atto 3?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L costs ₱1,628,000 compared to the BYD Atto 3 Dynamic at ₱1,638,000.
Which is more powerful between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L and BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 Dynamic has a max power of 204 PS compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L's 200 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L and BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 Dynamic offers an electric motor, making it more efficient and quieter in city driving conditions compared to the diesel engine of the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L.
Which is better for towing between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L and BYD Atto 3?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L's robust power output and 4×4 setup make it better suited for towing heavy loads or rough terrain, while the BYD Atto 3 Dynamic's FWD drivetrain limits its towing capacity.