Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs GAC M6 Pro GL (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs GAC M6 Pro GL (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | GAC M6 Pro GL (2024) GAC ₱1,598,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/150,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 174 PS @ 5500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 270 Nm @ 1400 - 4500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 7-DCT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4793 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1837 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1730 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2810 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 52 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | White, Blue, Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1660 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18" alloy |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/50/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/50/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs GAC M6 Pro GL (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a robust and capable vehicle suitable for both work and leisure, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is the better choice. It offers superior towing capacity with its powerful diesel engine and robust build quality, making it ideal for those who need a reliable truck in their daily life. The GAC M6 Pro GL, while more economical, lacks the power and practicality needed for heavy-duty tasks and has fewer features compared to the Ranger.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (₱1,628,000) and GAC M6 Pro GL (₱1,598,000)?
The GAC M6 Pro GL is the more economical option at ₱1,598,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT priced at ₱1,628,000.
Which vehicle has better towing capacity?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT offers superior towing capacity with its powerful diesel engine and robust build quality, making it the better choice for those needing a reliable truck for heavy loads or towing.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting due to its fuel efficiency?
The GAC M6 Pro GL has a higher fuel efficiency as it runs on gasoline. However, both vehicles' fuel economy data are not provided in the given information, so we cannot definitively say which one is better suited for daily commuting.
Which vehicle offers more advanced features and amenities?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT has fewer features compared to the GAC M6 Pro GL, which comes with a higher number of exterior colors and additional doors (5 instead of 4).