Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X RZ4E LS 4×2 AT (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X RZ4E LS 4×2 AT (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Isuzu mu-X RZ4E LS 4×2 AT (2025) Isuzu ₱1,725,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1898cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 150 PS @ 3600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 350 Nm @ 2600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | 4x2 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | SUV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4850 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1870 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1815 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2855 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 80 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Eiger Grey, Satin Pearl White, Mercury Silver, Splash White, Onyx Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1945 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 255/65R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 255/65R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Cloth |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Isuzu mu-X RZ4E LS 4×2 AT (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a rugged workhorse against a more family‑oriented SUV, the choice hinges on power, price and practicality. The 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT costs ₱1,628,000, is a true pickup with a 5‑cylinder 3.2‑litre turbo diesel that delivers 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, and comes with a 4WD system, making it superior for hauling, off‑road use and towing. Its 4‑door cabin seats 2 + 3 and its longer wheelbase (5277 mm) provides a larger cargo bed, but it lacks the extra rear seat and the body‑on‑frame SUV comfort of the Isuzu mu‑X. The 2025 Isuzu mu‑X RZ4E LS is priced slightly higher at ₱1,725,000, offers a smaller 1.9‑litre 4‑cylinder turbo diesel with 150 PS and 350 Nm, and is a 4×2 midsize crossover SUV with five doors and a 2 + 3 + 2 seating layout, giving more passenger capacity for families. Its body‑on‑frame construction still provides durability, but the lower power and lack of 4WD make it less suited for heavy loads or rough terrain. Choose the Ranger if you need maximum torque, 4WD capability and cargo space for work or adventure; opt for the mu‑X if you prioritize family seating, a newer model year and are comfortable with 2‑wheel drive for city and highway driving.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is priced at ₱1,628,000, which is ₱97,000 less than the Isuzu mu‑X RZ4E LS priced at ₱1,725,000.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Ranger’s 3.2‑litre inline‑5 produces 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, whereas the mu‑X’s 1.9‑litre inline‑4 makes 150 PS and 350 Nm, giving the Ranger a clear advantage in power and low‑end torque.
Which vehicle is better for family use?
The Isuzu mu‑X offers five doors and a 2 + 3 + 2 seating configuration, providing seating for up to seven passengers, making it more suitable for families than the Ranger’s 2 + 3 layout.
Is either vehicle all‑wheel drive?
The Ranger comes with a 4WD drivetrain, while the mu‑X is a 4×2 (two‑wheel drive) model, so only the Ranger provides all‑wheel drive capability.