Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,599,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2815 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1500 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable midsize crossover SUV with practical features and good fuel economy, the Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT is recommended. It offers better power output, more comfortable ride quality, and a wider range of exterior colors compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT. The Ranger is cheaper but lacks some modern conveniences and comfort features.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT has better power output with 163 PS compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak's 200 PS.
Is one vehicle more fuel efficient than the other?
Unfortunately, the data does not provide specific information on fuel efficiency. However, the Destinator uses a turbocharged engine which is generally more fuel-efficient for its power output compared to the Ranger's diesel engine.
Which vehicle offers better interior space and comfort?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GLS Turbo CVT has a more spacious interior with 5 doors and seating capacity of 2+3+2, offering more passengers room. It also provides a wider range of exterior colors for personalization.
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Destiner GLS Turbo CVT is the more affordable option at ₱1,599,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT's price of ₱1,628,000.