Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018), the choice hinges on intended use. The Ranger Wildtrak is a powerful pickup with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, ideal for off-road adventures, heavy hauling, or towing. Its 4WD system and higher ground clearance suit rough terrain, while the 6-speed automatic transmission offers convenience. However, it costs ₱1,628,000 and seats only 5. The NV350 Urvan, at ₱1,570,000, is cheaper and designed for passenger or cargo transport. With a 5-speed manual and RWD, it's less powerful (129 PS, 356 Nm) but can carry up to 12-15 people (seating not specified but typical for a van). It's better for family trips, shuttle services, or business use where space matters more than power. The Ranger is for those needing a rugged workhorse or lifestyle vehicle; the Urvan is for those prioritizing passenger capacity and lower cost. Both have similar warranty coverage (3 years/100,000 km). Choose the Ranger for power and off-road capability; choose the Urvan for people-moving and value.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak or the Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) is cheaper at ₱1,570,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) costs ₱1,628,000.
Which vehicle has more power and torque?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has significantly more power (200 PS vs 129 PS) and torque (470 Nm vs 356 Nm), making it better for towing and off-road driving.
Which is better for carrying many passengers?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is a van designed for passenger transport, likely seating up to 15 people, whereas the Ford Ranger Wildtrak seats only 5.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan may be more practical for city commuting due to its lower price and larger passenger capacity, but its manual transmission and RWD might be less convenient than the Ranger's automatic 4WD in traffic. The Ranger's higher power and torque are unnecessary for typical city driving.