Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T (2018) Nissan ₱1,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Van |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Van |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 18 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 65 |
| Construction | — | Body on Frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2076 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T (2018): which should you buy?
If you need a rugged, four‑wheel‑drive workhorse that can haul heavy loads and handle off‑road conditions, the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT is the clear choice. It comes with a more powerful turbo‑charged inline‑5 engine delivering 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, a 6‑speed automatic transmission, and a 4WD drivetrain—features that give it superior pulling power and versatility for both commercial use and recreational driving. Its price of ₱1,628,000 is only slightly higher than the Nissan NV350 Urvan’s ₱1,580,000, but the Ranger’s higher torque and all‑wheel drive make it better suited for uneven terrain or towing. Conversely, if you’re looking for a more economical, rear‑wheel‑drive van mainly for transporting people or light cargo in urban settings, the 2018 Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T offers a lower price point and adequate power (129 PS, 356 Nm) for city driving. It also features a body‑on‑frame construction and three doors, which may be preferable for passenger capacity. Ultimately, choose the Ranger for rugged utility and higher performance; choose the Urvan for budget‑friendly, everyday van use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard Plus M/T costs ₱1,580,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT costs ₱1,628,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger’s turbo‑charged inline‑5 engine produces 200 PS, whereas the Nissan Urvan’s inline‑4 engine delivers 129 PS.
Which is better for off‑road use?
The Ranger’s 4WD drivetrain and higher torque (470 Nm) make it better suited for off‑road or heavy‑load applications.
Which is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Nissan Urvan’s rear‑wheel drive, lower price, and body‑on‑frame construction make it a practical choice for everyday city driving and passenger transport.