Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV (2025) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV (2025) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV (2025) Changan ₱1,259,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,159,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 5 years or 150,000 kms | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | PHEV | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 212 PS | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | DHT | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Crossover | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Starshine Blue, Dazzle Grey, Astral Diamond Black, Putty Grey, Red, White | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4339 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1865 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1680 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2656 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1650 | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Airconditioning Dual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV (2025) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a midsize crossover SUV with good power and practicality, the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV is the better choice. It offers more power at 212 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's 105 PS, making it suitable for those who need a vehicle that can handle heavy loads or drive on rough terrain easily.
For daily commuting and family use, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is a better option. With its more affordable price tag at ₱1,159,000 compared to the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV's ₱1,259,000, it offers a smoother ride and a wider range of exterior colors.
Here are some real questions buyers might ask:
Which is cheaper? The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is cheaper at ₱1,159,000 compared to the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV's ₱1,259,000.
Which is more powerful? The Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV has a higher power output of 212 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT's 105 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting? The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT offers a smoother ride and a wider range of exterior colors, making it preferable for daily use and family transportation.
Which has more comfortable seats? Both vehicles offer similar seating capacities with a 2+3 configuration. However, the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV's unibody construction might provide better comfort due to its design focus on SUV performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is cheaper at ₱1,159,000 compared to the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV's ₱1,259,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV has a higher power output of 212 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT's 105 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT offers a smoother ride and a wider range of exterior colors, making it preferable for daily use and family transportation.
Which has more comfortable seats?
Both vehicles offer similar seating capacities with a 2+3 configuration. However, the Changan Nevo Q05 SE PHEV's unibody construction might provide better comfort due to its design focus on SUV performance.