Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) Chevrolet ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,159,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2021 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000 km | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 999cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 116 PS @ 5800 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 4200 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Small Crossover SUV | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Crossover | MPV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Satin Steel Gray Metallic, Agate Red Metallic, Black Meet Kettle Metallic, Summit White, Pow Zinga Metallic | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4270 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1791 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1627 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1230 | 1260 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 40 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 215/55/R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55/R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Airconditioning | Manual Airconditioning Dual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Chevrolet Tracker 1.0 Turbo LS A/T (2021) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a small crossover SUV with good power and practicality, the Chevrolet Tracker is the better choice. It offers more torque, which can be beneficial in urban driving conditions. The Mitsubishi Xpander, while cheaper, has less powerful engine and fewer features. For daily commuting, the Tracker's 175 Nm of torque makes it easier to navigate through traffic without needing to rev the engine excessively.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Chevrolet Tracker with 175 Nm of max torque at 4200 rpm compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander with 141 Nm of max torque at 1600-2800 rpm.
Is the Chevrolet Tracker cheaper than the Mitsubishi Xpander?
No, the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX AT is slightly cheaper at ₱1,159,000 compared to the Chevrolet Tracker LS A/T at ₱1,219,000.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data provided doesn't specify fuel efficiency for either vehicle. However, both have similar displacement and power output. Fuel efficiency would depend on other factors not included in the specifications.
Is the Chevrolet Tracker better suited for daily commuting than the Mitsubishi Xpander?
Yes, the Chevrolet Tracker with its 175 Nm of torque can handle urban driving more easily without needing to rev the engine excessively, making it a better choice for daily commuting compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander's 141 Nm.