GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) GWM ₱2,678,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱2,840,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2024 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 3-years/100,000km | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1967cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Max Power | 217 PS @ 5500 rpm | 168 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 3600 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 8-A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Large Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | Crossover |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Orange, White, Grey, Red, Black | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4760 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1930 | 1815 |
| Height (mm) | 1903 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2750 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2155 | 1855 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 75 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" alloy | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" alloy | 19 |
| Front Tires | 265/65/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65/R17 | 235/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt + Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Nappa leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 9 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
GWM Tank 300 2.0L Turbo 4×4 AT (2024) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GL 2WD Standard Range (2026): which should you buy?
The GWM Tank 300 and Hyundai IONIQ 5 target very different buyers despite overlapping price points. The Tank 300, priced at ₱2,678,000, is a body‑on‑frame large crossover SUV with a 2.0 L turbo gasoline engine delivering 217 PS and 380 Nm, paired to an 8‑speed automatic and permanent 4WD. It offers rugged capability, a three‑row 2+3 seating layout and a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, making it suited for families or adventurers who need off‑road confidence and higher torque at low revs. The IONIQ 5, at ₱2,840,000, is a midsize unibody crossover powered by an electric motor producing 168 PS and 350 Nm, with a rear‑wheel‑drive layout and a longer, wider footprint (4655 mm × 1815 mm). Its 5‑year/200,000 km warranty and zero‑emission operation favor urban commuters and tech‑savvy buyers prioritising lower running costs and modern styling. Power‑wise the Tank 300 is stronger and quicker off the line, while the IONIQ 5 offers smoother acceleration and instant torque typical of EVs, albeit with less peak power. If you need serious off‑road ability, higher torque and a traditional SUV feel, the Tank 300 is the better choice. If you prefer eco‑friendly driving, a longer warranty and a more spacious cabin for city use, the IONIQ 5 wins.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The GWM Tank 300 is priced at ₱2,678,000, which is lower than the Hyundai IONIQ 5’s price of ₱2,840,000.
Which has more power?
The Tank 300 delivers 217 PS, while the IONIQ 5 provides 168 PS, making the Tank 300 more powerful.
Which is better for daily commuting in the city?
The IONIQ 5, with its electric drivetrain, zero emissions, longer warranty and unibody construction, is better suited for urban commuting.
Which offers a longer warranty?
Hyundai offers a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty on the IONIQ 5, compared to GWM’s 3‑year/100,000 km warranty on the Tank 300.