Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 | Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024) Mazda ₱3,780,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 229 PS | 300.9 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 603 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Artisan Red Premium, Sonic Silver, Jet Black, Deep Crystal Blue Mica, Rhodium White |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 7 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 5120 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1994 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1745 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 3120 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2005 | 2140 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 74 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 21 |
| Front Tires | 255/45R20 | 275/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 255/45R20 | 275/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, power, and practicality, the Mazda CX‑90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo edges ahead in overall value despite its slightly higher price of ₱3,780,000 versus the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range at ₱3,698,000. The CX‑90 delivers a markedly higher maximum power of 300.9 PS and torque of 603 Nm, compared to the IONIQ’s 229 PS and 350 Nm, making it better suited for drivers who prioritize performance or need to haul heavier loads. It also offers a larger body type—Large Crossover SUV versus Midsize—and seats seven, providing more passenger capacity for families or group travel. The IONIQ’s electric powertrain is attractive for eco‑conscious commuters and those with access to charging infrastructure, offering a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty and RWD drivetrain; however, it lacks the versatility of AWD. In terms of price, the IONIQ is slightly cheaper and may appeal to buyers focused on electric driving and lower operating costs. Ultimately, choose the Mazda CX‑90 if you need higher power, AWD capability, and seven seats; opt for the Hyundai IONIQ 5 if you prefer electric propulsion, a midsize crossover, and a marginally lower purchase price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range costs ₱3,698,000, while the Mazda CX‑90 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo costs ₱3,780,000.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX‑90 produces 300.9 PS, higher than the IONIQ’s 229 PS.
Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?
The Mazda CX‑90 seats seven passengers, whereas the IONIQ seats 2+3 (five).
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Hyundai IONIQ’s electric motor and 5‑year/200,000 km warranty make it suitable for eco‑friendly daily commuting if charging access is available; the Mazda CX‑90’s higher power and AWD may suit drivers needing more versatility or passenger space.