Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,068,000 | Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023) Mazda ₱2,990,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Warranty | 5-years/200,000km | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Electric Motor | Inline-4 |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Diesel |
| Max Power | 168 PS | 254 PS @ 3750 rpm |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm | 550 Nm @ 1500 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | Automatic | 8-A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Displacement | — | 3283cc |
| Valvetrain | — | DOHC 24-valve |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.2:1 |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | Crossover | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray | Rhodium White Premium, Soul Red Crystal |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4655 | 4745 |
| Width (mm) | 1890 | 1890 |
| Height (mm) | 1605 | 1680 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3000 | 2870 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1880 | 1897 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 58 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring | Double Wishbone, Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Rear Wheels | 19 | 20" alloy |
| Front Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55R19 | 235/50/R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | — | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | Yes | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range (2026) vs Mazda CX-60 3.3L AWD HEV Turbo-D Sport (2023): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical and future‑proof option, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Standard Range is the better pick. It comes at ₱3,068,000 versus the Mazda CX‑60’s ₱2,990,000, a slightly higher price but with the advantage of zero fuel costs and a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty. The IONIQ 5’s electric motor delivers 168 PS and 350 Nm, while the Mazda’s turbo‑charged diesel engine produces a higher 254 PS and 550 Nm, giving the CX‑60 more power for spirited driving or heavy loads. However, the IONIQ 5’s RWD layout and electric drivetrain make it ideal for city commuting, low running costs, and a cleaner environment. The Mazda CX‑60 offers AWD traction, higher torque for off‑road or rough‑terrain use, and a shorter warranty but at the cost of diesel fuel expenses. If you prioritize power, off‑road capability and a shorter warranty period, choose the Mazda; if you value lower operating costs, longer warranty, and zero emissions, go with the Hyundai.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mazda CX‑60 is priced at ₱2,990,000, while the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS costs ₱3,068,000, making the Mazda slightly cheaper.
Which has more power?
The Mazda CX‑60’s 3.3L turbo diesel engine delivers 254 PS and 550 Nm, compared to the Hyundai IONIQ 5’s electric motor with 168 PS and 350 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5, being electric with zero fuel costs and a longer warranty, is more suitable for daily commuting in the city.
Which offers better traction?
The Mazda CX‑60 has AWD, providing superior traction for off‑road or rough terrain, whereas the Hyundai is RWD.