Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 18-seater (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 18-seater (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,470,000 | Nissan NV350 Urvan 18-seater (2018) Nissan ₱1,449,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged Intercooled, VGS |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 18 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan 18-seater (2018): which should you buy?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is the better value for a Filipino buyer needing capacity. At ₱1,449,000, it is ₱21,000 cheaper than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s ₱1,470,000, even though it has lower power (129 PS vs 150 PS). The NV350’s 18-seater capacity makes it superior for transporting goods or passengers, while the Ranger’s AWD system offers better traction in varied terrain. Both have 6-speed manual transmissions and body-on-frame construction, but the NV350’s longer warranty (3 years/100,000 km vs 100,000 km/3 years) adds confidence. Choose the Ranger if you prioritize off-road capability and need a single-cab pickup; select the NV350 for bulk transport and budget efficiency.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan costs ₱1,449,000, ₱21,000 less than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s ₱1,470,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak delivers 150 PS vs 129 PS for the Nissan NV350 Urvan.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak’s 2+3 seating and AWD system may suit short commutes better, while the NV350’s 18-seater capacity is impractical for daily trips.
What is the warranty duration?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has a 100,000 km/3-year warranty; the Nissan NV350 Urvan has a 3-year/100,000 km warranty.