Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) Toyota ₱1,958,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3956cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 268 PS @ 5200 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 366 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4670 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1905 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1830 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2690 | 2815 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2510 | 1500 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid live axle, four link system | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota FJ Cruiser 4.0 L V6 4WD AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing rugged capability against everyday practicality, the choice hinges on intended use and budget. The 2015 Toyota FJ Cruiser commands a slightly higher price (₱1,958,000) but offers a 4.0 L V6 delivering 268 PS and 366 Nm, paired with a 5‑speed automatic and AWD on a body‑on‑frame platform—ideal for off‑road adventures, heavy loads, or families needing a sturdy 2+3‑seat SUV. Its larger footprint (4670 mm length) and higher torque make it better suited for rough terrain and towing, though fuel consumption may be higher given the naturally aspirated V6. Conversely, the 2026 Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo costs ₱1,929,000, about ₱29,000 less, and packs a 1.5 L turbocharged inline‑4 with 163 PS and 250 Nm, mated to a CVT and front‑wheel drive. Built on a unibody midsize crossover, it seats 2+3+2, offering more passenger capacity and a modern palette of exterior colors, making it a more practical daily commuter for urban Manila traffic. Its lower displacement and front‑wheel drive promise better fuel economy and easier maneuverability. Choose the FJ Cruiser if off‑road performance and rugged durability are priorities; opt for the Destinator GT if you need a newer, more fuel‑efficient, family‑friendly crossover at a marginally lower price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo is priced at ₱1,929,000, which is ₱29,000 less than the Toyota FJ Cruiser’s ₱1,958,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Toyota FJ Cruiser’s 4.0 L V6 produces 268 PS, whereas the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo’s 1.5 L engine delivers 163 PS, making the FJ Cruiser significantly more powerful.
Which SUV is better for daily commuting in the city?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo, with its smaller turbocharged engine, front‑wheel drive, unibody construction, and three‑row seating, is more fuel‑efficient and easier to maneuver in urban traffic, making it better suited for daily city use.
Which vehicle offers more seating capacity?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo seats 2+3+2 (seven passengers), while the Toyota FJ Cruiser seats 2+3 (five passengers), so the Destinator provides greater passenger capacity.