Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V 4×4 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V 4×4 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V 4×4 AT (2016) Toyota ₱2,168,000 | Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020) Mitsubishi ₱1,927,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2016 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2755cc | 2442cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 176 PS @ 3400 rpm | 181 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 450 Nm @ 1600-2400 rpm | 430 Nm @ 2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 8-speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15.5:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4785 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1815 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1805 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 1745 | 2800 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1925 | 1910 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 68 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White Diamond, Jet Black Mica, Blade Silver Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, Coil Springs | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/60/R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/60/R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V 4×4 AT (2016) vs Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD 8AT (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against capability, the Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS 2WD (2020) edges out the older Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V 4×4 (2016) in overall value. The Montero Sport is priced at ₱1,927,000, roughly ₱241,000 cheaper, while still delivering slightly higher peak power (181 PS vs 176 PS) and a modern 8‑speed automatic, which promises smoother shifts and better fuel efficiency than the Fortuner’s 6‑speed unit. Both vehicles share a body‑on‑frame construction and five‑door layout, but the Fortuner offers a 4WD system and a larger 2.8‑litre turbo‑diesel engine that produces 450 Nm of torque, giving it stronger low‑end pull for off‑road or heavy‑load situations. However, the Fortuner is not currently available, making the Montero Sport the practical choice for immediate purchase. Both come with the same 3‑year/100,000 km warranty, and seating capacity is comparable (Fortuner 2+3+2, Montero Sport unspecified but typical for its class). If you need genuine 4WD capability and maximum low‑rpm torque for rugged trips, the Fortuner remains the better tool, provided you can source one. For most daily commuters, families, or buyers seeking a newer model with better fuel‑efficiency, more gears, and a lower price, the 2020 Montero Sport is the recommended pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2.4L GLS (2020) costs ₱1,927,000, which is about ₱241,000 less than the Toyota Fortuner 2.8 V (2016) priced at ₱2,168,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Montero Sport produces 181 PS at 3,500 rpm, slightly higher than the Fortuner’s 176 PS at 3,400 rpm.
Is the Fortuner’s 4WD advantage significant?
The Fortuner’s 4WD system and higher torque of 450 Nm (vs 430 Nm in the Montero Sport) give it stronger low‑end pulling power for off‑road or heavy‑load use.
Which SUV is more practical for daily use in the Philippines?
The Montero Sport, being a current‑model with an 8‑speed automatic, lower price, and immediate availability, is more practical for everyday commuting and family use, while the Fortuner’s lack of availability and higher cost make it less convenient.