Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) Ford ₱2,058,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4893 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1862 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1836 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2815 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1500 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wishbone with coil over shock and Roll bar | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Live Axle, 4bar link, coil spring, Anti-roll bar and watts link | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50 R20 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Electronic Automatic Temperature Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 10 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium (2017) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers weighing a 2017 Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium against the newer 2026 Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT, price and power are key differentiators. The Everest comes in at ₱2,058,000 while the Destinator is slightly cheaper at ₱1,929,000, offering a savings of ₱129,000. In terms of performance, the Everest’s 2198cc turbo‑charged diesel engine delivers 160 PS and a robust 385 Nm torque, whereas the Destinator’s smaller 1499cc turbo‑charged gasoline unit produces 163 PS but only 250 Nm. The Everest’s 6‑speed automatic and rear‑wheel drive give it a more traditional SUV feel, suited for rugged or off‑road use, while the Destinator’s CVT and front‑wheel drive are better for city commuting with smoother acceleration. Both vehicles share a 5‑door layout and a 2+3+2 seating arrangement, but the Everest’s larger dimensions (4893 mm length and 1862 mm width) provide more interior space. The Everest’s warranty is 100,000 km or 3 years, identical to the Destinator’s coverage. If a buyer prioritizes off‑road capability, higher torque, and slightly larger cabin space, the Everest is preferable despite its higher price. Conversely, if cost savings, a newer model year, and a gasoline engine with adequate power for everyday driving are more important, the Destinator is the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT costs ₱1,929,000, while the Ford Everest Titanium 2.2 4×2 AT Premium is ₱2,058,000.
Which has more power?
The Destinator’s engine produces 163 PS, slightly higher than the Everest’s 160 PS.
Which offers more torque?
The Everest provides 385 Nm of torque compared to the Destinator’s 250 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Destinator’s CVT transmission and front‑wheel drive offer smoother city driving, while the Everest’s larger engine and rear‑wheel drive are geared more toward off‑road or rugged use.