Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024) Foton ₱1,385,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1968cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS @ 4000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 380 Nm @ 1800 |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 2WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5340 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1940 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1870 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 76 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2000 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/70R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/70R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,328,000 versus ₱1,385,000 for the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024). Key differences include 160 PS vs 161 PS power and a 6-speed manual transmission vs automatic, with the Ranger’s rear-wheel-drive layout offering more stability in Philippine roads. The Ranger’s 2+3 seating vs 5 seats makes it more versatile for small families, while the Thunder’s longer warranty (5 years vs 100,000 km) adds long-term confidence. Budget-conscious buyers prioritizing practicality and reliability will find the Ranger more compelling, though the Thunder’s higher output may suit heavier loads. Consider the Ranger if affordability and versatility matter most; choose the Thunder if you value extra comfort and extended coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) costs ₱1,328,000, while the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024) costs ₱1,385,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) delivers 160 PS, while the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024) produces 161 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is more practical for daily commuting with a 6-speed manual transmission and 2+3 seating, compared to the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024)’s 5 seats and automatic gear.
What is the warranty difference?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) has a 100,000 km/3-years warranty, while the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×2 AT Sports (2024) offers 5 years or 150,000 km.