Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 | Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) Foton ₱1,298,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1968cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 161 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 390 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed Manual |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5340 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1940 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1870 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3110 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 76 |
| Construction | — | Body-on-frame |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1990 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/70R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/70R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) vs Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is the better value for most Filipino buyers, priced at ₱1,328,000 versus ₱1,298,000 for the Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024). It offers slightly higher power (160 PS vs 161 PS) and torque (385 Nm vs 390 Nm) with a more accessible 100,000km/3-year warranty, while the Ranger’s rear-wheel-drive setup may suit users prioritizing stability and lower maintenance. The Foton’s 4WD and 5-seat capacity appeal to those needing versatility in varied terrain, but the Ranger’s lower cost and proven reliability make it the smarter daily commuter choice. For a daily driver valuing practicality and budget, the Ranger wins; for heavy-duty work or off-road versatility, the Foton is worth considering.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) costs ₱1,298,000, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is ₱1,328,000.
Which has more power?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) delivers 161 PS, slightly higher than the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)’s 160 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) is more practical for daily commutes due to its lower price and rear-wheel-drive configuration.
Which is better for off-road use?
The Foton Thunder 2.0 4×4 MT (2024) is better for off-road use because it has 4WD and a 5-seat capacity, unlike the rear-wheel-drive Ranger.