Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Radar RD6 Econ (BEV) 4WD 73kWh (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Radar RD6 Econ (BEV) 4WD 73kWh (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱1,628,000 | Radar RD6 Econ (BEV) 4WD 73kWh (2026) Radar ₱1,748,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2017 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3198 | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 381 PS |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 485 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Direct type |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Pickup |
| Segment | Pick-Up | Pickup |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 5260 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1900 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1865 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3120 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Aurora White, Charcoal Grey, Cosmos Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2210 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Multi-Link w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/65R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 225/65R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Single zone climate control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | PVC leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2017) vs Radar RD6 Econ (BEV) 4WD 73kWh (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who prioritises proven diesel reliability, towing capacity and a traditional body‑on‑frame pickup, the 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT remains the pragmatic choice. It costs ₱1,628,000, is backed by a 100,000 km/3‑year warranty and delivers 200 PS and 470 Nm of torque, which is ample for hauling and off‑road work. Its 6‑speed automatic and 4WD system are familiar to local mechanics, and the larger width (2,198 mm) gives a sturdier stance for load‑carrying. Conversely, the 2026 Radar RD6 Econ BEV, priced at ₱1,748,000, offers a modern electric drivetrain with 381 PS and 485 Nm, delivering instant torque and AWD traction. Its unibody construction and slightly shorter length (5,260 mm) make it more car‑like and potentially more comfortable for daily commuting, while the 5‑year/150,000 km warranty adds peace of mind for early‑adopter EV owners. However, the RD6’s electric range isn’t specified, and charging infrastructure in many Philippine regions is still developing. Choose the Ranger if you need rugged utility, lower upfront cost and established service support. Opt for the Radar RD6 if you want higher performance, zero‑emission driving and are comfortable with EV charging realities.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak costs ₱1,628,000, which is ₱120,000 less than the Radar RD6 Econ priced at ₱1,748,000.
Which pickup has more power?
The Radar RD6 Econ electric motor produces 381 PS, surpassing the Ranger’s 200 PS diesel engine.
What are the warranty differences?
The Ranger offers a 100,000 km or 3‑year warranty, while the Radar RD6 provides a longer 5‑year or 150,000 km warranty.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Radar RD6’s electric powertrain, AWD and car‑like unibody design make it more suited for daily commuting, whereas the Ranger is geared toward heavy‑duty work and off‑road tasks.