Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000
Overview
Model Year 2018 2026
Warranty 100,000 km/3-years 3 years or 100,000 kms
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 2999cc 1499cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Turbo Intercooler Turbocharged
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Max Power 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm 163 PS
Max Torque 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm 250 Nm
Transmission 6-Speed A/T CVT
Drivetrain RWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Midsize Crossover SUV
Segment J MPV
Doors 4 5
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3+2
Length (mm) 4825 4680
Width (mm) 1860 1840
Height (mm) 1840 1780
Wheelbase (mm) 2845 2815
Fuel Tank (L) 65 45
Construction Unibody
Exterior Colors Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic
Curb Weight (kg) 1500
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring
Rear Suspension 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer Torsion beam w/Coil Spring
Front Wheels 18 Alloy 18
Rear Wheels 18 Alloy 18
Front Tires 255/60 R18 225/55R18
Rear Tires 255/60 R18 225/55R18
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Disc
Steering Type Power Asisted EPS
Steering Column Tilt & Telescopic Tilt & Telescope
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist Yes No
Parking Sensors Yes No
Stability Control Yes No
Traction Control Yes No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist Yes Yes
Hill Descent Control Yes No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag Yes No
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag Yes No
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Engine Immobilizer Yes Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Auto Climate Control System Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Leatherette
Parking Brake Manual EPB
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start Yes No
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes Yes
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes Yes
Remote Trunk Release No Yes
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes no
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 6 8
Touchscreen Yes Yes
Navigation Yes No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Apple CarPlay No Yes
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes No
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes No
DVD Player Yes No
MP3 Playback Yes No
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights LED LED
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights Yes Yes
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer who prioritizes power, torque and a robust diesel engine for heavy-duty or long-haul use, the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 is the better choice. It costs ₱1,845,000—slightly cheaper than the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT’s ₱1,929,000—yet delivers a higher peak power of 177 PS and a much larger torque output of 380 Nm, ideal for towing or off‑road tasks. The mu‑X’s RWD layout and 6‑speed automatic transmission also suit rugged terrain, whereas the Destinator’s FWD CVT is tuned for city driving and fuel economy. The mu‑X seats only 5 (2+3) compared to the Destinator’s 7 (2+3+2), so if you need more passenger capacity, the Destinator is preferable. However, the mu‑X’s diesel engine offers better longevity for heavy use and its 100 000 km/3‑year warranty covers a longer distance. The Destinator, being newer (2026) and built on a unibody midsize crossover platform, offers more modern styling and a broader color palette, but its gasoline engine’s lower torque (250 Nm) may limit performance in demanding conditions. Thus, choose the Isuzu mu‑X for power and durability or the Mitsubishi Destinator if you need more seats, a newer model, and a gasoline engine for everyday commuting.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 costs ₱1,845,000, while the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT is priced at ₱1,929,000.

Which has more power and torque?

The Isuzu mu‑X delivers 177 PS at 3550–3650 rpm and 380 Nm torque between 1800–2800 rpm, whereas the Destinator offers 163 PS and 250 Nm.

Which is better for daily commuting?

The Destinator’s FWD CVT and gasoline engine are tuned for city driving, while the mu‑X’s diesel RWD setup is more suited to heavy or off‑road use.

Which can seat more passengers?

The Destinator seats 7 (2+3+2) compared to the mu‑X’s 5 (2+3).