Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) Isuzu ₱1,845,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 177 PS @ 3550 - 3650 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2815 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | 45 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1500 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Double Wish bone with coil spring and stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 5-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 Alloy | 18 |
| Front Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 255/60 R18 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power Asisted | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X LS-A 4×2 3.0 AT (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer who prioritizes power, torque and a robust diesel engine for heavy-duty or long-haul use, the 2018 Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 is the better choice. It costs ₱1,845,000—slightly cheaper than the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT’s ₱1,929,000—yet delivers a higher peak power of 177 PS and a much larger torque output of 380 Nm, ideal for towing or off‑road tasks. The mu‑X’s RWD layout and 6‑speed automatic transmission also suit rugged terrain, whereas the Destinator’s FWD CVT is tuned for city driving and fuel economy. The mu‑X seats only 5 (2+3) compared to the Destinator’s 7 (2+3+2), so if you need more passenger capacity, the Destinator is preferable. However, the mu‑X’s diesel engine offers better longevity for heavy use and its 100 000 km/3‑year warranty covers a longer distance. The Destinator, being newer (2026) and built on a unibody midsize crossover platform, offers more modern styling and a broader color palette, but its gasoline engine’s lower torque (250 Nm) may limit performance in demanding conditions. Thus, choose the Isuzu mu‑X for power and durability or the Mitsubishi Destinator if you need more seats, a newer model, and a gasoline engine for everyday commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X LS‑A 4×2 costs ₱1,845,000, while the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT is priced at ₱1,929,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu‑X delivers 177 PS at 3550–3650 rpm and 380 Nm torque between 1800–2800 rpm, whereas the Destinator offers 163 PS and 250 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Destinator’s FWD CVT and gasoline engine are tuned for city driving, while the mu‑X’s diesel RWD setup is more suited to heavy or off‑road use.
Which can seat more passengers?
The Destinator seats 7 (2+3+2) compared to the mu‑X’s 5 (2+3).