Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2018) Toyota ₱1,921,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2018 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2393cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | VN Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 147 PS @ 3400 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 400 Nm @ 1600-2000 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1855 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1835 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2745 | 2815 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1795 | 1500 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone, Coil Springs | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | 4-Link, Coil Springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R17 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Power | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescopic | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4×2 AT (White Pearl) (2018) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Toyota Fortuner 2.4 V 4x2 AT (2018) at ₱1,921,000 and the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) at ₱1,929,000 hinges on priorities. The Fortuner is a body-on-frame SUV with diesel power (147 PS, 400 Nm) and RWD, ideal for off-road or heavy-duty use, but its 2018 model year means older tech. The Destinator is a newer (2026) unibody crossover with a gasoline turbo (163 PS, 250 Nm) and CVT, offering better on-road comfort and fuel efficiency for daily commuting. The Fortuner seats 7 (2+3+2) and has a longer wheelbase, while the Destinator also seats 7 but is more car-like. Price difference is minimal (₱8,000), so the Destinator is better for city driving and modern features, while the Fortuner suits those needing ruggedness and diesel torque. The Destinator's two-tone paint options add style. If you prioritize off-road capability and diesel, pick the Fortuner; for daily use and newer tech, choose the Destinator.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Toyota Fortuner is slightly cheaper at ₱1,921,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Destinator at ₱1,929,000, a difference of only ₱8,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Mitsubishi Destinator has higher peak power at 163 PS vs the Fortuner's 147 PS, but the Fortuner has more torque (400 Nm vs 250 Nm), making it better for towing or off-road.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Destinator is better for daily commuting due to its unibody construction, gasoline engine with CVT, and newer model year, offering smoother and more fuel-efficient city driving.
Which has a larger engine displacement?
The Toyota Fortuner has a larger 2393cc diesel engine, while the Mitsubishi Destinator has a 1499cc gasoline engine, so the Fortuner's engine is bigger in displacement.