Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×2 AT (2025) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×2 AT (2025) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×2 AT (2025) Isuzu ₱2,320,000 | Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,929,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 3 years or 100,000 kms | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-Valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 190 PS @ 3600 rpm | 163 PS |
| Max Torque | 450 Nm @ 2800 rpm | 250 Nm |
| Transmission | Automatic 6-Speed | CVT |
| Drivetrain | 4x2 | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Midsize Crossover SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | SUV | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Exterior Colors | Eiger Grey, Satin Pearl White, Mercury Silver, Splash White, Onyx Black | Quartz White Pearl (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Lunar Blue Mica (Two-Tone w/Black Roof), Blade Silver Metallic, Red Metallic, Jet Black Mica, Graphite Grey Metallic |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4850 | 4680 |
| Width (mm) | 1870 | 1840 |
| Height (mm) | 1825 | 1780 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2855 | 2815 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 2700 | 1500 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-link with Coil Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 20 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/50R20 | 225/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/50R20 | 225/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Tilt & Telescope | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leatherette |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4×2 AT (2025) vs Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo CVT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing power, price and everyday practicality, the Isuzu mu‑X 3.0 LS‑E 4×2 AT edges out the Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo for those who need true SUV capability and higher performance, while the Destinator GT Turbo is the better value for families prioritising lower cost and fuel‑efficient gasoline operation. The mu‑X costs ₱2,320,000, about ₱391,000 more than the Destinator, but it delivers a 190 PS turbo‑diesel engine with 450 Nm of torque, far surpassing the Destinator’s 163 PS and 250 Nm. The mu‑X’s body‑on‑frame construction and 4×2 drivetrain give it a more rugged SUV feel, whereas the Destinator’s unibody MPV layout is lighter and likely more comfortable for city driving. Both share a five‑door layout and 2+3+2 seating, but the mu‑X’s higher torque at low rpm benefits load‑carrying and hill climbs, while the Destinator’s gasoline engine may be cheaper to run and maintain. Both offer a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. Choose the mu‑X if you need stronger pulling power, off‑road confidence and are willing to pay the premium; choose the Destinator if you want a cheaper, fuel‑friendly crossover for typical urban family use.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Destinator GT Turbo is cheaper at ₱1,929,000, about ₱391,000 less than the Isuzu mu‑X.
Which has more power and torque?
The Isuzu mu‑X provides 190 PS and 450 Nm of torque, whereas the Destinator GT Turbo offers 163 PS and 250 Nm.
Is there a difference in drivetrain or construction?
Yes. The mu‑X is a body‑on‑frame SUV with a 4×2 drivetrain, while the Destinator is a unibody MPV with front‑wheel drive.
Which is better for daily city commuting?
The Destinator GT Turbo’s lower price, gasoline engine and unibody design make it more suited for typical city commuting and family use.