Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,039,000 | Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015) Honda ₱982,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1497cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 120 PS @ 6600 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 145 Nm @ 4600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Segment | Pickup | M |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4398 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1683 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1603 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2652 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1170 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson, Coil Spring w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 15x5.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 15x5.5 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R16 | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Dual Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen + Foglamps |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT (2015): which should you buy?
If you need a rugged workhorse that can haul and tow, the 2013 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT is the better pick. It offers a diesel engine with 150 PS and 330 Nm torque, a body‑on‑frame construction, and a 5‑speed manual transmission that deliver more power for heavy loads. The Ranger also seats five and is built on a pickup chassis, making it ideal for commercial use or off‑road adventures. On the other hand, if you prioritize everyday comfort and fuel economy in a city or family setting, the 2015 Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT is more suitable. It has a lighter, unibody MPV design with 120 PS and 145 Nm torque, a CVT for smoother city driving, and seats seven. Price-wise, the Mobilio is cheaper at ₱982,000 versus the Ranger’s ₱1,039,000. Thus, choose the Ranger for work and tough terrain; choose the Mobilio for daily commuting and family trips.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Mobilio 1.5 RS Navi CVT costs ₱982,000, while the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT is ₱1,039,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger’s diesel engine delivers 150 PS and 330 Nm torque, whereas the Honda Mobilio’s gasoline engine produces 120 PS and 145 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Mobilio’s CVT, unibody construction, and 7‑seat capacity make it more suited for city driving and family use.
Which is better for heavy-duty tasks?
The Ford Ranger’s body‑on‑frame pickup design, higher torque, and manual transmission make it more capable for towing and off‑road work.