Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,199,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between these two Ford Ranger models depends on your need for off-road capability versus on-road refinement and power. The 2013 Ranger 2.2 XLS 4x4 MT (₱1,199,000) is the more affordable option and comes with all-wheel drive (AWD), making it ideal for those who frequently tackle rough terrain, muddy roads, or need better traction in wet conditions. However, it has slightly less power (150 PS) and torque (375 Nm) compared to the 2017 Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT (₱1,219,000). The XLT, priced ₱20,000 higher, is rear-wheel drive (RWD) only, which is more fuel-efficient and sufficient for daily commuting and light hauling on paved roads. It offers more power (160 PS) and torque (385 Nm), providing better acceleration and overtaking capability. Both have the same seating capacity (2+3) and similar dimensions, but the XLT is a 2017 model, so it may have minor updates in features and reliability. If you need off-road capability, choose the 2013 XLS 4x4. If you prioritize on-road performance and newer model year, go with the 2017 XLT. Note that both are discontinued, so availability depends on used car inventory.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The 2013 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4x4 MT is cheaper at ₱1,199,000, while the 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT costs ₱1,219,000.
Which is more powerful?
The 2017 Ranger XLT 2.2L 4x2 MT is more powerful with 160 PS and 385 Nm of torque, compared to the 2013 XLS 4x4 MT's 150 PS and 375 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The 2017 Ranger XLT 4x2 is better for daily commuting due to its rear-wheel drive, which offers better fuel economy on paved roads, and its higher power output for smoother highway driving.
Which has better off-road capability?
The 2013 Ranger XLS 4x4 MT has better off-road capability thanks to its all-wheel drive (AWD) system, making it suitable for rough terrain and poor road conditions.