Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R16 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer choosing between the 2013 and 2017 Ford Ranger XLT 4x2 MT, the 2017 model is the clear winner. Both are priced identically at ₱1,219,000, but the 2017 version offers significantly more power (160 PS vs 120 PS) and torque (385 Nm vs 285 Nm), a smoother 6-speed manual transmission instead of a 5-speed, and a more efficient turbocharged engine. The 2017 also has a rear-wheel-drive layout, which is typical for pickups and better for load carrying, while the 2013 is front-wheel drive—unusual and less capable for heavy hauling. The 2017 is slightly longer (5277 mm vs 5274 mm), but both have the same seating and body-on-frame construction. The 2013 is a 2011-era design, while the 2017 benefits from a mid-cycle refresh with improved engine and transmission. Unless you specifically want a front-wheel-drive pickup (which is rare), the 2017 model provides better performance, drivability, and resale value for the same price. However, both are discontinued, so availability depends on used car listings. For daily commuting and light hauling, the 2017's extra power and torque make it more enjoyable and capable. If budget is tight, the 2013 is still a decent workhorse, but the 2017 is the smarter buy overall.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: the 2013 or 2017 Ford Ranger XLT?
Both models are priced exactly the same at ₱1,219,000, based on the data provided.
Which has more power and torque?
The 2017 model produces 160 PS and 385 Nm, significantly more than the 2013's 120 PS and 285 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The 2017 model is better for daily commuting due to its more powerful engine, higher torque for overtaking, and a 6-speed manual transmission for smoother driving.
What are the key differences in drivetrain and transmission?
The 2013 is front-wheel drive with a 5-speed manual, while the 2017 is rear-wheel drive with a 6-speed manual. The 2017's RWD is more typical for pickups and offers better towing and hauling capability.