Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,360,000 | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,328,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16 valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Pick Up |
| Segment | Pickup | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | — |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 3220 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 18 |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/60 R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual-zone EATC |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×2 MT (2013) vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing the 2013 and 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 models, the newer 2017 unit offers the better overall value despite a marginally lower price tag (₱1,328,000 vs ₱1,360,000). It delivers 160 PS and 385 Nm, a modest bump over the 2013’s 150 PS and 375 Nm, and the torque peak starts a little later, giving a smoother pull in everyday driving. The 2017 version also adds a few millimetres of width (2163 mm vs unspecified for 2013), which can improve cabin comfort and stability, while both retain the same 6‑speed gearbox, though the 2013 comes with an automatic and the 2017 with a manual, letting buyers choose their preferred driving style. Both share the same RWD layout, body‑on‑frame construction, seating capacity and overall length, so practicality and load‑carrying remain comparable. The 2017 model is still in current production, meaning parts and service support are more readily available, whereas the 2013 is discontinued. If you prioritize a newer vehicle with slightly higher power, a manual transmission, and better after‑sales support, the 2017 Ranger is the clear pick. However, if you need an automatic gearbox and can accept an older, discontinued model, the 2013 may still suit you, albeit at a higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2017 Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 is priced at ₱1,328,000, which is ₱32,000 less than the 2013 model’s ₱1,360,000 price.
Which Ranger has more power?
The 2017 version produces 160 PS, while the 2013 version produces 150 PS, making the 2017 model more powerful.
Is there a difference in transmission type?
Yes, the 2013 Ranger comes with a 6‑speed automatic transmission, whereas the 2017 model is equipped with a 6‑speed manual transmission.
Which model is better for daily commuting?
The 2017 Ranger offers newer production status, slightly higher power, and a manual gearbox that many drivers prefer for city driving, making it a more practical choice for daily commuting.