Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 AT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 AT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 AT (2013) Ford ₱1,530,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16 valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 AT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4x4 AT (2013) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) depends on your primary need: personal or family transport versus commercial or group passenger use. The Ranger is a discontinued pickup (₱1.53M) with 150 PS and 375 Nm, AWD, and a 6-speed automatic—ideal for those who need off-road capability, towing, or a rugged daily driver. It seats 5 and offers a more powerful engine. The NV350 Urvan (₱1.57M) is a current van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, RWD, and a 5-speed manual—better for transporting up to 12+ passengers or cargo, with a larger interior and newer model year. The Urvan is more practical for businesses, shuttle services, or large families, while the Ranger suits adventure seekers or those needing a pickup's versatility. The Ranger is cheaper by ₱40,000 but discontinued, so parts may be harder to find. The Urvan has a higher seating capacity and is still in production. If you prioritize power and off-road, choose the Ranger. If you need space and passenger capacity, choose the Urvan.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Ford Ranger Wildtrak or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,530,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000, a difference of ₱40,000.
Which has more power: Ford Ranger Wildtrak or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has 150 PS and 375 Nm of torque, while the Nissan NV350 Urvan has 129 PS and 356 Nm. The Ranger is more powerful in both horsepower and torque.
Which is better for daily commuting: Ford Ranger Wildtrak or Nissan NV350 Urvan?
For daily commuting, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak with its automatic transmission and AWD may be more convenient, but the Nissan NV350 Urvan offers more passenger space. The Ranger is better for personal use, while the Urvan is better for group transport.
Which vehicle is still available for purchase new?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan (2018 model) is currently available, while the Ford Ranger Wildtrak (2013 model) is discontinued.