Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,470,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 2.2 4×4 MT (2013) and Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) serve completely different purposes. The Ranger is a pickup with AWD and 150 PS/375 Nm, making it ideal for off-road, towing, and utility tasks. It's cheaper at ₱1,470,000 but discontinued, meaning you'll buy used. The NV350 is a van with 129 PS/356 Nm, RWD, and seating for up to 15? (data says 3 doors, but typical Urvan seats many; data lacks seating capacity for NV350). It's newer (2018), still on sale at ₱1,570,000, and better for transporting groups or cargo in urban settings. If you need rugged capability and lower cost, choose the Ranger. If you need a passenger or delivery vehicle with a current warranty, choose the NV350.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is cheaper at ₱1,470,000 compared to the Nissan NV350 Urvan at ₱1,570,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Ford Ranger produces 150 PS and 375 Nm, higher than the Nissan NV350's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
It depends. The Ranger's AWD and pickup body suit off-road/utility commuting, while the NV350's van design is better for transporting many people or cargo in urban areas.
Which has a better warranty?
Both offer a 3-year/100,000 km warranty. However, the Ranger is discontinued, so any warranty would be from the original purchase if still valid, whereas the NV350 is current and covered as new.