Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,639,000 | Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,539,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 20" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 20" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 10 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | Yes |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Ford Everest 2.2 Trend 4×2 AT (2015): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 (₱1,639,000) offers superior power and capability for Filipino buyers prioritizing off-road performance and towing, while the Ford Everest 2.2 (₱1,539,000) is a more economical SUV suited for daily commuting. The Ranger’s 200 PS engine and AWD system provide better traction and utility, whereas the Everest’s 160 PS engine and rear-wheel-drive layout make it easier to maneuver in city traffic. Both vehicles have 100,000km/3-year warranties, but the Ranger’s higher price reflects its stronger powertrain and body-on-frame construction, making it the better option for rugged tasks. The Everest’s lower cost and 5-door design are ideal for families needing versatility without the Ranger’s weight.