Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,639,000 |
Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018)
Nissan
₱1,570,000
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2018 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/ 100,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 3198cc | 2488cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 129 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm | 356 Nm @ 1400 - 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 15:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Segment | Pickup | Van |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Body on Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 15 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1990 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2555 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 2076 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Gun Metallic, Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Alpine White, Topaz Brown, Graphite Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 65 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | Torsion Beam |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Rigid Axle, Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Rear Wheels | 18" Alloys | 15 steel |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 195/70/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual Aircon w/ rear independent controls |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) vs Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2 4×4 MT (2013) and the Nissan NV350 Urvan Standard M/T (2018), the choice hinges on lifestyle needs. The Ranger Wildtrak is a discontinued but powerful pickup with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, ideal for off-road adventures or heavy-duty work. Its AWD drivetrain and body-on-frame construction suit rugged terrain, but it's a 2013 model with no warranty and limited availability. The NV350 Urvan, a current model, is a practical van with 129 PS and 356 Nm, perfect for family transport or business use. It offers more passenger space (up to 15 seats) and a lower price at ₱1,570,000 vs ₱1,639,000. However, it has a manual transmission and RWD, less capable off-road. If you need a workhorse for hauling and off-road, choose the Ranger. For daily commuting, passenger transport, or a newer vehicle with warranty, pick the Urvan.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is cheaper at ₱1,570,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Wildtrak at ₱1,639,000.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is significantly more powerful with 200 PS and 470 Nm torque, versus the NV350 Urvan's 129 PS and 356 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Nissan NV350 Urvan is better for daily commuting due to its van body type, passenger capacity, and being a current model with warranty, though it has a manual transmission.
Which has better off-road capability?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak has better off-road capability with AWD, body-on-frame construction, and higher ground clearance, while the NV350 Urvan is RWD and less suited for rough terrain.