Hyundai Accent Hatchback 1.6 E AT (2014) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai Accent Hatchback 1.6 E AT (2014) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai Accent Hatchback 1.6 E AT (2014) Hyundai ₱858,000 | Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023) Foton ₱880,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2023 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/5-years | 5 years or 150,000 kms |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1582cc | 2156cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | 16 Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDi | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Max Power | 128 PS @ 4000 rpm | 87 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 260 Nm @ 1900-2750 rpm | 220 Nm @ 2000 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | B | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4115 | 4705 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1457 | 2028 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2570 | 2400 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1175 | 1560 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 60 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut Type w/ Coil Spring | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Rear Suspension | Coupled Torsion Beam Axle | Leaf Spring Non-Independent |
| Front Wheels | 14" Steel | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 14" Steel | 14 |
| Front Tires | 175/70 R15 | 175/70R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/70 R15 | 175/70R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Hyundai Accent Hatchback 1.6 E AT (2014) vs Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van (2023): which should you buy?
The Hyundai Accent Hatchback 1.6 E AT (2014) is the better choice for most Filipino buyers, especially for daily commuting or light use, given its lower price of ₱858,000 versus ₱880,000 for the Foton Harabas TM300 F-Van. The Accent offers 128 PS of power and a 4-speed automatic transmission, making it easier to drive daily, while the van is priced higher and has a manual transmission with a different drivetrain (RWD vs FWD). The Accent’s 5-door hatchback design with 2+3 seating is more practical for personal use, whereas the van’s 3-door body-on-frame construction and 3-seater capacity suggest it is suited for transporting goods rather than passengers. Both vehicles are diesel-powered and have limited warranty coverage, but the Accent’s longer warranty period (5 years/unlimited) adds value for reliability. For a practical, affordable daily driver, the Accent wins. For heavy hauling or commercial purposes, the van is the only option here.