Hyundai Eon 0.8 GLS MT (2014) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Hyundai Eon 0.8 GLS MT (2014) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Hyundai Eon 0.8 GLS MT (2014) Hyundai ₱498,000 | Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) Suzuki ₱614,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2020 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/5-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 814cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 9-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 56 PS @ 5500 rpm | 96 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 75 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Segment | A | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3495 | 4195 |
| Width (mm) | 1550 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2380 | 2205 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1065 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 43 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 13x4.5" Steel Rims | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 13x4.5" Steel Rims | 13 |
| Front Tires | 155/70 R13 | 165/80/R13 |
| Rear Tires | 155/70 R13 | 165/80/R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Hyundai Eon 0.8 GLS MT (2014) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer focused on city commuting, low purchase cost and compact dimensions, the 2014 Hyundai Eon 0.8 GLS MT is the more sensible pick. It costs ₱498,000, about ₱116,000 less than the 2020 Suzuki Carry, and its 3.5‑meter length and five‑door hatchback layout make it easier to park and carry up to five passengers. Power is modest at 56 PS, but the Eon’s lightweight, front‑wheel‑drive setup is adequate for daily urban trips and offers a longer warranty of unlimited mileage for five years, giving extra peace of mind despite being discontinued. The Suzuki Carry, priced at ₱614,000, delivers a significantly stronger 96 PS engine and 135 Nm of torque, plus a rear‑wheel‑drive, body‑on‑frame chassis that is better suited for cargo hauling or light commercial use. However, it only seats two, has a pickup body, and a shorter warranty of three years/100,000 km. If you need a workhorse for small‑scale business, cargo transport, or rural roads, the Carry’s higher power and payload capacity outweigh its higher price and limited seating. Otherwise, for everyday commuting, fuel‑efficient city driving, and lower upfront cost, the Hyundai Eon remains the better choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Hyundai Eon costs ₱498,000, which is ₱116,000 less than the Suzuki Carry priced at ₱614,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Suzuki Carry produces 96 PS, considerably higher than the Hyundai Eon’s 56 PS.
Which is more practical for daily commuting?
The Hyundai Eon’s compact hatchback design, five‑door access, and five‑seat capacity make it more practical for daily city commuting.
Is the Suzuki Carry better for cargo or business use?
Yes; its pickup body, higher torque (135 Nm) and rear‑wheel‑drive layout are suited for cargo hauling and light commercial tasks, though it seats only two.