Kia Carnival 3.3 V6 SXL AT 7P (2014) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Kia Carnival 3.3 V6 SXL AT 7P (2014) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Kia Carnival 3.3 V6 SXL AT 7P (2014) Kia ₱2,800,000 | Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017) Ford ₱2,288,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 160,000km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Inline-5 |
| Displacement | 3342cc | 3198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | DOHC 20-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Turbocharged CRDI |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 270 PS @ 6400 rpm | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 318 Nm @ 5200 rpm | 470 Nm @ 1750 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Segment | M | J |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 7 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5115 | 4893 |
| Width (mm) | 1985 | 1862 |
| Height (mm) | 1767 | 1836 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3060 | 2850 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1968 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson Strut with Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Rear Suspension | Gas Type Shock Absorber | Live Axle |
| Front Wheels | 19 Alloy | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19 Alloy | 20 |
| Front Tires | 235/55 R19 | 265/50 R20 |
| Rear Tires | 235/55 R19 | 265/50 R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | Yes | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Tri-Zone,Full Auto Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 8-Speakers | 10 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector Type | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Kia Carnival 3.3 V6 SXL AT 7P (2014) vs Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium 4×4 AT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing a family‑oriented people‑mover against a rugged SUV, the choice hinges on budget, power delivery and intended use. The 2014 Kia Carnival 3.3 V6 SXL AT costs ₱2,800,000, about ₱512,000 more than the 2017 Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium AT, but it offers a larger cabin (7‑seat van, 5115 mm length) and a smoother naturally‑aspirated V6 that produces 270 PS and 318 Nm, giving a more refined driving feel for city and highway cruising. Its FWD, body‑on‑frame construction and 6‑speed automatic are suited to comfortable family trips rather than off‑road challenges. The Ford Everest, priced at ₱2,288,000, delivers stronger low‑end torque (470 Nm at 1750 rpm) from a turbo‑charged 3.2 L diesel inline‑5, making it better for hill climbs and occasional off‑road use. Its 4WD system, shorter wheelbase (4893 mm) and 2+3+2 seating layout provide flexibility for cargo and passengers, while the diesel engine offers better fuel economy for long distances. If you need a premium, spacious van for daily commuting and family outings and can stretch the budget, the Carnival is the better fit. If you prioritize lower price, higher torque for rugged terrain and diesel efficiency, the Everest is the more practical choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Everest 3.2 Titanium Premium AT is cheaper at ₱2,288,000 compared to the Kia Carnival’s ₱2,800,000 price.
Which model has more power?
The Kia Carnival’s 3.3 L V6 produces 270 PS, while the Ford Everest’s 3.2 L diesel makes 200 PS, so the Carnival is more powerful.
Which vehicle offers higher torque?
The Ford Everest delivers 470 Nm of torque at 1750 rpm, surpassing the Carnival’s 318 Nm, giving the Everest better low‑end pulling power.
Which is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Carnival’s larger, 7‑seat van layout, smoother V6 and FWD setup make it more comfortable for daily family commuting, whereas the Everest is geared toward mixed on‑ and off‑road use.